my '17 cvt is proving to be even more aggressive, holding as low as 1200rpm at 30mph, 15 60mph. I have personally achieved 3.3L/100km at speeds varying from 45mph to 60mph with my '14 cvt. If you like the convenience of the CVT, you're going to take a hit, but its not the end of the world.in the third chart there are no data points for speeds below 50mph shown with cvt and at the top of the chart (highest speeds) there would have to be an error or the Philippines spec manual has different gears than US spec as it's a proven fact that US spec cvt runs almost 1000rpm lower than US spec manual at or above 60mph. That being said, the difference isn't gigantic. Gas mileage/MPG test: 2014 Mirage CVT vs. mpg/mileage/fuel economy chart - Mirage 1.2L 5-spd and CVT But shift quality and fuel economy vary, so check our ratings and try before you buy.My bet goes to the 5 speed manual in both conditions. Most manual transmissions can deliver better fuel economy and acceleration. Because relatively few buyers are choosing manual transmissions, the car could be harder to sell later.Congested traffic conditions can require a lot of shifting and working the clutch pedal.We found that in some cars, having to depress the clutch pedal fully made an already bad driving position worse.For example, a car with a manual transmission is harder to get under way when stopped on an uphill (although many these days come with a helpful hill-holder feature). Manuals require more skill and experience to operate well.They are found mainly on small cars and sports cars. Manual transmissions are available on only a relatively few models, which narrows your choices.Of course, there are other disadvantages to buying a stick: (The basic Sonic we tested was a sedan the turbocharged, manual-transmission LTZ was a hatchback.) Cheaper cars, such as the Hyundai Accent and Mazda2, all got better mileage with a stick shift. On the other hand, the Chevrolet Sonic got better mileage with its six-speed manual transmission, even with its turbocharged engine, than it did with the base engine and six-speed automatic transmission. We saw the same effect with the Ford Fiesta with its basic 1.6-liter, four-cylinder engine. In a few cases, however, the latest automatic-transmission designs, including six-speed automatics, actually surpass their manual counterparts.įor example, the Mazda3 i gets one more mpg with its six-speed automatic than its six-speed manual, largely because the automatic has taller gearing, so the engine revs slower on the highway, using less gas. In most, we found the manual delivered better mpg overall. We have bought several sets of test cars of different types with both manual transmission and automatic transmissions and run them through our fuel-economy and acceleration tests. And many drivers find driving with a stick more engaging and fun. That can be a welcome benefit with a smaller engine. Manual transmissions often can also improve acceleration, sometimes significantly. In our tests, we've found that in some cars a manual transmission can improve gas mileage by a significant 2 to 5 mpg, compared with an automatic, and can cut a car's price by $800 to $1,200. In your quest for better fuel economy and more value, don't overlook the potential benefits of shifting yourself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |